Interested in contributing to the Developer community?
Can you write expert articles and news addressing web development including Unix, CSS, HTML, javascript and other developer related topics? If so, we are looking for you. Contact techwriters@ientry.com.

Recent Articles

CRON – Doing Work On Your Schedule
The cron service is a basic utility in UNIX that provides the ability for different processes to be run at specific times each day. This can be useful for any number of things, from backing up files to downloading email.

How To Setup Gentoo Style Colors For Bash On...
This Linux/Unix tutorial will show you how to colorize your Bash prompt to resemble the colors of Gentoo Linux is easier than you think. First, see if the default...

Is It Time For OpenSolaris Users To Jump Ship?
Since Oracle acquired Sun Microsystems and with it, several open source technologies, OpenSolaris users want to know where Oracle's priorities lie. OpenSolaris has had three stable releases in approximately six...

BitDefender Rolls Out Antivirus Scanner For UNIX
In many organizations UNIX-based workstations are becoming popular as a cost effective computing resource. As UNIX-based endpoints become easier...


07.13.10



SCO's Battle Against Linux Continues

By Bryan Young

For eight years, the SCO group, which produces several versions of the Unix Operating System, has been on the legal warpath against Linux. It maintains that certain Linux distributors copied portions of Unix for use in their operating systems.

As of yet, the courts have all but thrown out these claims, as SCO has yet to provide sufficient evidence that copyrights were infringed. The evidence that has been used is now available to public eyes.

Lawyer Kevin McBride, the brother of SCO's former CEO Darl McBride, commented on a post on his website with a few code examples of the supposed copyright infringement. These examples show a very weak case on the part of SCO in its claims of wrong-doing. The lines that are indicated as copies are not identical, and are in the majority of cases (I did not take the time to compare every case) are of basic functionality that could very easily be a simple case of one best implementation. Some of the indicated "copied" lines are borderline embarrassing on the part of SCO, including such things as return statements and blank lines.


Luckily, this is very much a non-issue after the SCO vs Novell case where it was determined by the courts that the copyrights to UNIX do not belong to SCO at all, but are actually the property of Novell. Considering that Novell has no interest in a lawsuit against Linux at this time, I would conjecture that there really is not a case to be made. As to the motive behind SCO's legal moves, there are a number of different theories circulating the internet, and the truth may never be known.

For now, it seems that Linux is safe from those who would see it destroyed. Especially after seeing the quality of evidence that can be mounted in a copyright trial, I am convinced that there is nothing to be concerned over.


About the Author:
Bryan is a staff writer for WebProNews
About UnixProNews
UnixProNews is a collection of news and commentary designed to keep you in step with the ever evolving landscape of Unix environments. News and Advice for Unix Professionals
iEntry





UnixProNews is brought to you by:

SecurityConfig.com NetworkingFiles.com
NetworkNewz.com WebProASP.com
DatabaseProNews.com SQLProNews.com
ITcertificationNews.com SysAdminNews.com
LinuxProNews.com WirelessProNews.com
CProgrammingTrends.com ITCertificationNews.com






-- UnixProNews is an iEntry, Inc. publication --
iEntry, Inc. 2549 Richmond Rd. Lexington KY, 40509
2010 iEntry, Inc. All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy Legal

archives | advertising info | news headlines | free newsletters | comments/feedback | submit article


News and Advice for Unix Professionals UnixProNews News Archives About Us Feedback UnixProNews Home Page About Article Archive News Downloads WebProWorld Forums Jayde iEntry Advertise Contact